<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why The Economist is thriving</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiekermann.com/en/why-the-economist-is-thriving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiekermann.com/en/why-the-economist-is-thriving/</link>
	<description>Typomania is incurable but not lethal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Typographer profile: Erik Spiekermann &#171; logicenemy</title>
		<link>http://spiekermann.com/en/why-the-economist-is-thriving/comment-page-1/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>Typographer profile: Erik Spiekermann &#171; logicenemy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiekermann.com/en/?p=621#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>[...] This article on his blog discusses why Spiekermann&#8217;s redesign of the magazine is increasing the magazine&#8217;s redearship. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] This article on his blog discusses why Spiekermann’s redesign of the magazine is increasing the magazine’s redearship. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://spiekermann.com/en/why-the-economist-is-thriving/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiekermann.com/en/?p=621#comment-377</guid>
		<description>It is very easy to convince clients to use a typeface that actually reads better. Just put it into the current layout, print it out and let them judge for themselves. That’s what we did with The Economist. Our type is a little smaller than the old one, but still reads better. We left the leading and increased the tracking. Now the type can breathe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very easy to convince clients to use a typeface that actually reads better. Just put it into the current layout, print it out and let them judge for themselves. That’s what we did with The Economist. Our type is a little smaller than the old one, but still reads better. We left the leading and increased the tracking. Now the type can breathe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian Enasoni</title>
		<link>http://spiekermann.com/en/why-the-economist-is-thriving/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucian Enasoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiekermann.com/en/?p=621#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Good job on the redesign! It is really hard to convince clients that this typeface is better than the other, unless they have some basic creativity knowledge. Recently I made a small opening program sheet for a showroom, and the creative department told me...&#039;but please set it in Times New Roman, that is the font we use for all the materials&#039;... &#039;Oh, ok, I said&#039;... (!?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job on the redesign! It is really hard to convince clients that this typeface is better than the other, unless they have some basic creativity knowledge. Recently I made a small opening program sheet for a showroom, and the creative department told me…‘but please set it in Times New Roman, that is the font we use for all the materials’… ‘Oh, ok, I said’… (!?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

