decoration
Spiekerblog
 

18. 01. 10

Treble-trouble

3
Human capac­ity to make mis­takes is unlim­ited, as Mur­phy for­mu­lates in the epony­mous law. Bill Hill sent me this pic­ture from Cal­i­for­nia. The fig­ure 3 appears six times. Why are the bot­tom fig­ures upside down while all the oth­ers are the proper way round? Does the per­son who put the fig­ures on that sign know some­thing we type design­ers don’t know?

 

SpiekermannPartners

12 Responses to “Treble-trouble”:


 

1

As it seems this is quite symp­to­matic for “gaso­line peo­ple”. I’v taken this pic­ture last sum­mer in Aus­tria. See the num­ber 8 :-)

 

2

I think the bot­tom 3s used to be 8s, and since they used up all their 3s for the other prices they got cre­ative for the pre­mium price.

 

3

Obvi­ously, peo­ple who put the num­bers on those signs are not uni­ver­sity grad­u­ates. It’s just sur­pris­ing that with odds of 50:50, more often than not they get it wrong. Or on the money, as in my example.

 

4

[…] This post was men­tioned on Twit­ter by Keith Erring­ton, Type is Beau­ti­ful. Type is Beau­ti­ful said: Erik Spiek­er­mann 抱怨美国加州的油价牌对待字牌的粗暴,问题在哪里? http://spiekermann.com/en/treble/ 研究字要火眼金睛。想到去年圣学子的一篇: http://bit.ly/lyBHY […]

 

5

While we read­ers and writ­ers of typog­ra­phy blogs imme­di­ately rec­og­nized the error, there is unlikely to be any error in read­ing the sign. Every­body can eas­ily see the pre­mium gas is $3.339 per gal­lon. Despite the fre­quency of ver­ti­cally flipped 3s and 8s, I have yet to see a gross error such as a fig­ure flipped horizontally.

The 3s on the bot­tom are clearly flipped ver­ti­cally and are not mod­i­fied 8s. To my eye, the 3s ori­ented cor­rectly look like they are sym­met­ric; how­ever, if you were to flip them ver­ti­cally (e.g. in Pho­to­shop; I did) they’d obvi­ously be upside down, and they’d look exactly like the 3s on the bot­tom. So a casual observer might think at first glance that the 3s actu­ally are symmetric.

Many peo­ple prob­a­bly think the fig­ure 3 really is sym­met­ric about a hor­i­zon­tal axis. Such fig­ures prob­a­bly are, at least the way we learn them in Amer­i­can schools. (I’m from Cal­i­for­nia too.)

At nor­mal read­ing dis­tances, such as the van­tage point of the pho­to­graph, the asym­me­try is appar­ent. From the view­point of some­one han­dling the actual fig­ures, an unnat­u­rally close read­ing dis­tance, it might not be apparent.

There might also be a mechan­i­cal expla­na­tion. The upper two prices could have been installed while the per­son was stand­ing up. The bot­tom­most price could have required the installer to bend over, which might have affected the motion he used in pulling let­ters out of the box (or what­ever they were stored in) result­ing in the fig­ures being installed incorrectly.

But even if the gas sta­tion owner real­ized the error, or it was pointed out to him, he prob­a­bly doesn’t care. After all, this is of con­cern only to type geeks, and gas prices are going to change again next week anyway.

 

6

As i state under the “about” head­ing, i am sick with Typo­ma­nia, so i see things that other peo­ple do not. Your analy­sis is spot on as far as the rest of mankind is concerned.

 

7

The real odd thing about those fig­ures is that they are not 3’s, as they would be fac­ing the other way around (i assume the back side of each plate is pure white so they can be rotated but not flipped). They are obvi­ously not hacked 8’s either. There­fore the per­son might actu­ally know some­thing we don’t about the mag­i­cal num­ber of 333.. :)

 

8

When a num­ber appears as many times as its value you are sup­posed to be set them upside down.

333
4444
55555
666666

and so on, sur­prised you didn’t know that erik.

 

9

And I didn’t know that, and I don’t believe it, but it’s great idea.

 

10

Always amaz­ing what hap­pens when there is a con­ver­sa­tion about some­thing that most peo­ple never notice. Makes me won­der what I am miss­ing in other domains. And thanks Erik for pub­lish­ing this shot, I thought of you when I took it…

 

11

Look what we have here..

http://twitpic.com/1a96f6

Spot­ted this on the way to col­lege today.

 

12

I won­der how many will notice if I turn these num­bers upside down…”

Reynir Heiðberg Stefánsson
April 13th, 2010 at 13:23 pm

 






 

Leave a Reply

 

© Erik Spiekermann | Spiekerblog is proudly powered by WordPress.