1

I’m not try­ing to be crit­i­cal I just noticed at a quick glance, he didn’t redesign the FedEx logo with the ‘EX’ being ‘Ex,’ giv­ing it the arrow in the neg­a­tive space, (which is what I like about this logo) or did he use Uni­verse 65 Bold as in the original.

I think this is a neat exercise.

Eric
January 22nd, 2007 at 13:46 pm

3

It is an inter­est­ing col­lec­tion. One note: These were designed by a vari­ety of people.

The four that I redesigned (West­ing­house, United, IBM and ABC), weren’t as much of a Web 2.0 state­ment but a state­ment about the cheap tricks the major brand­ing firms are apply­ing to clas­sic Rand and Bass logos.
You can see my orig­i­nal post here: http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2006/07/logo_news_8_the_future.shtml”

Bennett Holzworth
January 22nd, 2007 at 19:07 pm

4

hehehe… more lake quaker 2 pt. oats… nice post! i just hope those aren’t the only logos we see in the remain­ing decade!

FEI
January 22nd, 2007 at 20:11 pm

7

it’s fixed

joely hegarty
January 22nd, 2007 at 22:15 pm

8

some of them look just very nice actu­ally! hehe­hehe just kiddin

Caio
February 9th, 2007 at 05:37 am

9

These were done by a bunch of design­ers over at yayhooray.com. We/They were look­ing for a way to kill time and were sick of see­ing yet another redesign for a com­pany giv­ing into cheap trends.

jselig
February 9th, 2007 at 19:58 pm

10

Don’t let their mar­ket­ing depart­ments see these. They will love them.

Chris Keegan
February 27th, 2007 at 04:12 am